Amazon employees face discipline for testifying against data centers; retaliation claims filed
Three Amazon employees from the Amazon Employees for Climate Justice (AECJ) group—Darius Irani, Patrick Schloesser, and Liesl Wigand—say they are under investigation by their employer after testifying in favor of Seattle's one-year AI data-center moratorium. The Seattle City Council passed the measure in June 2026, and Amazon called the three to separate Zoom calls with HR shortly after, where they were told the company was investigating concerns about their public comments. Staff say they were intimidated during the calls, are being monitored at work, and may face possible termination.
Amazon's HR department told the employees that while they are free to discuss their working environment, they cannot speak as company representatives. An Amazon spokesperson said "we believe it's important to apply our policies consistently so, just as we would with anyone else, we're investigating whether there was a violation of our policies and may or may not take action based on what we find." However, the three employees' lawyers argued in a letter to the Seattle Office for Civil Rights (SOCR) that they did not use company time when making their testimony, nor did they mention their employer or share proprietary information.
The legal representatives cited potential grounds for discipline including possible termination, alleging intimidation during the Zoom calls and workplace monitoring. This is not the first confrontation: Amazon reportedly fired two AECJ-affiliated workers in 2020 for highlighting warehouse safety issues during the pandemic. The three are asking SOCR to investigate the retaliation allegations. This also comes as Amazon faces public backlash over its planned expansion of AI data centers into Seattle and other municipalities, citing concerns over noise, water use, and electricity capacity.
For architects: this underscores growing tensions between cloud-provider capex ambitions and community pushback on data-center siting. Whether Amazon's investigation constitutes illegal retaliation will depend on jurisdiction-specific whistleblower and labor protections, but the optics damage is significant. Expect similar conflicts as hyperscalers race to build multi-GW clusters near power sources—siting disputes will increasingly involve community testimony and potential employee activism.